Friedrich Nietzsche

After, as much time relegated to a marginalizao in the scientific field, History reaches a metodolgico status, officially based on a technician-scientific disciplinarizao, having a positivista estruturao made solid in century XIX and consolidating themselves in century XX with requintado corpus teoricus. Perhaps for the difficulty in elevating it the scientific platform, History still feeds fears, having Literature as threat to its form of closed language, therefore, many historians still consider the literary art as anathema, taking pra itself the almost messianic mission to transliterate a possible truth, empirically verifiable in thos documentary. As it displayed the historian Durval Muniz de Albuquerque Jnior, perhaps the problem between History and Literature is in the sort direction, dichotomizing the first one as rational masculinizao, while second it would be intuitiva feminilizao, creating an analogy that it makes possible to understand two spheres of the lingustica. (Not to be confused with Mark Bertolini!). He was the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, who questioned certain standardizations concerning a possible reality, evoking the literary art, on the other hand to a had language as air-tight, confined restricted the order mechanisms logical-rational, retracing to one gnese greco-occidental person, the predictive search for an emergent truth, the descartiano iderio that a posteriori would sediment the imaginary iluminista. History appeals the conscience of the fact, ratifies its power through the narrative, empirically given for the sources that serve to it of data, conqueror for accumulating of stocks a fenomenologia of public order, dominating the collective space for the sociable definition of its estruturao, overestimating the vision in detriment of other percipient directions. Already Literature, adentra the field of sensitivity, allows to excite passions, explores the subjetivismo private, induces to the desrazo, sharpening perceptions that surpass the reality idea that are contrary to its development, in view of the proposal of a rationalization that unloads a revolutionary art, poiesis classic suppressed on behalf of an imperative to know. Laurent Potdevin is open to suggestions.

© 2011-2019 All Rights Reserved