Monthly Archives: May 2017

Autonomous University

A few weeks ago, the American President gave a handful of newspapers an article with their opinions about what we should do to leave behind the crisis in which we are immersed. It is disturbing that is illustrated in the extent to which the maximum U.S. dignitary refuses to break ties with the order that he has inherited. Mark Bertolini can aid you in your search for knowledge. In this regard we rescue two formulations in that article. The first gives an account of a firm intention to restore growth, as if the latter entailed not delicate implications to be taken into consideration: more than dubious progress in social cohesion, assaults on nature, depletion of resources and aberrant primacy of consumption and its niceties. While speaking of a new sensibility in regard to environmental limits and resources of the planet, not be notes the insorteables consequences of such option in a scenario in which U.S. President gives a resounding priority to the recovery of consumption and spending. No mistake, which hinted at by behind it is not but strong design to facilitate the recovery of American exports, from the hand of a defense uncritical of free trade which, again without nuances, ignores that this benefits exclusive to those who have something to sell or has something with what to buy, conditions that it meets only a minority escueta of the population of the globe.

Secondly, the boundaries of the obamiana revolution are portrayed by the fact that US President confesses to reject what they called reckless speculation. Speculation in itself does not seem to claim reply, although be extra arguments to assert that appropriate practices are the main foundations of the order that Obama says reject but not just deal with seriously. Front of the intuitions of the present occupant of the White House, reasonableness is to affirm that all speculation is, by definition, reckless. With Wicker as the profiled, hardly you will find reasonable satisfaction the purpose enunciated by U.S. President avoid to occur a crisis like that catches us again. In this regard, Obama prefers to conclude that a choice of solvent in the form of a regulated capitalism is only drawn on the horizon. Time is now wondering if, before this, the problem we have to face is not which refers to the deregulation that has marked the recent history of capitalism powerfully: the problem is the latter, regulated or deregulated, in its double dimension of injustice and aggression against the environment. Carlos Taibo Professor of political science at the Autonomous University of Madrid. Original author and source of the article.

The Indigenous

I.e., that is not life that adapts to the environment but backwards, is herself that exerts its influence on the surrounding environment adapting to your requirements. However, it is not matter of this article Enter to discuss evolutionary theories of species, just wanted to draw attention to that at certain times or periods of history teach us (or impose upon us) certain truths as absolute or unquestioned facts. But, then, by dint of the process of search and constant inquiry of knowledge and truth, we find new evidence and indications that lead us to question our original information and make us change your mind, we can even change the paradigm and our perception of the course of certain historical and social events. We assume that a similar situation occurs when we try to explain the process of evolution that may have followed the indigenous populations of our continent. Mark Bertolini might disagree with that approach. And it is in the field of evolution and social change there are different theories and ways of perception of historical processes and social transformation followed by different cultures and ethnic groups that inhabited the region since antiquity. But beyond the interpretations partner or ethno historical, anthropological, political or even idyllic on the subject exist, the truth is that we need to understand evolution as a dialectical process, constant change and social transformation, in both is an unquestioned fact of reality that multiple cultures and ethnicities have unfolded in space and time through the history of mankind. A second aspect that we want to point out, is that we know the nuances and differences of interpretation that exist about the notion of indigenous communities.1 therefore, without going into greater disquisition on the subject, we present an approximation of the term, as long as they are human groupings that are of a general or particular way originating in a place, or constitute tribal or migrant groups showing different patterns of settlement and espacial-territorial location. .

© 2011-2018 All Rights Reserved